<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Minor Blog Changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thoughtdistillery.com/2004/07/05/46/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thoughtdistillery.com/2004/07/05/46</link>
	<description>100% pure ideas, ramblings, and amusements</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:36:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://thoughtdistillery.com/2004/07/05/46/comment-page-1#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtdistillery.com/blog/?p=46#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Scott! Now when we click on a link in the comments the page opens in full browser window, instead of miniature un-enlargable (that I could see) comments window. Yea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Scott! Now when we click on a link in the comments the page opens in full browser window, instead of miniature un-enlargable (that I could see) comments window. Yea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://thoughtdistillery.com/2004/07/05/46/comment-page-1#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtdistillery.com/blog/?p=46#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Well, in an effort to simplify and at Katie&#039;s apparent abhorrent feelings toward pop-up window comments, I&#039;ve axed the pop-up entirely. If anyone misses it dreadfully, then let me know and I&#039;ll cobble together a shoe that fits all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, in an effort to simplify and at Katie&#8217;s apparent abhorrent feelings toward pop-up window comments, I&#8217;ve axed the pop-up entirely. If anyone misses it dreadfully, then let me know and I&#8217;ll cobble together a shoe that fits all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L. Claudia</title>
		<link>http://thoughtdistillery.com/2004/07/05/46/comment-page-1#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>L. Claudia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtdistillery.com/blog/?p=46#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Time to launch complaint number one from a grumpy old-fashioned girl who doesn&#039;t like change.  Just unsuccessfully attempted to leave an anonymous dirty-minded comment.  This new system is so techy clean that it doesn&#039;t allow such filth to slip into the sheets of this personal blog - whoops, sorry!  Getting a little naughty again!  How is a girl like me supposed to maintain a conservative affectation with no secure outlet for the evil thoughts bursting on her brain?  Is the spirit of Fred Rogers editing for the Thought Distillery&#039;s new comment system?  Back in the old days of this blog, a girl could be naughty on the sly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to launch complaint number one from a grumpy old-fashioned girl who doesn&#8217;t like change.  Just unsuccessfully attempted to leave an anonymous dirty-minded comment.  This new system is so techy clean that it doesn&#8217;t allow such filth to slip into the sheets of this personal blog &#8211; whoops, sorry!  Getting a little naughty again!  How is a girl like me supposed to maintain a conservative affectation with no secure outlet for the evil thoughts bursting on her brain?  Is the spirit of Fred Rogers editing for the Thought Distillery&#8217;s new comment system?  Back in the old days of this blog, a girl could be naughty on the sly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thoughtdistillery.com/2004/07/05/46/comment-page-1#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtdistillery.com/blog/?p=46#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Hey, does this new system work at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, does this new system work at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://thoughtdistillery.com/2004/07/05/46/comment-page-1#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtdistillery.com/blog/?p=46#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Dear Grumpy Dirty-Minded Girl,

I think I have determined the source of your problems - me. No wait. Make that your web browser. I have a hunch you are using Mozilla web browser because after a quick test I got the same results.

There is a fairly easy solution however! Open the Mozilla &quot;Preferences&quot; and navigate to &quot;Advanced&quot; and then &quot;Cache&quot;. Click on the option labeled &quot;Every time I view the page&quot;. Click on &quot;OK&quot; and Voila! Your browser should now see new comments after you submit. This setting nudges your browser to check for changes in web pages a little more often.

And now, back to my normal anger inducing posts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Grumpy Dirty-Minded Girl,</p>
<p>I think I have determined the source of your problems &#8211; me. No wait. Make that your web browser. I have a hunch you are using Mozilla web browser because after a quick test I got the same results.</p>
<p>There is a fairly easy solution however! Open the Mozilla &#8220;Preferences&#8221; and navigate to &#8220;Advanced&#8221; and then &#8220;Cache&#8221;. Click on the option labeled &#8220;Every time I view the page&#8221;. Click on &#8220;OK&#8221; and Voila! Your browser should now see new comments after you submit. This setting nudges your browser to check for changes in web pages a little more often.</p>
<p>And now, back to my normal anger inducing posts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L. Claudia</title>
		<link>http://thoughtdistillery.com/2004/07/05/46/comment-page-1#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>L. Claudia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtdistillery.com/blog/?p=46#comment-99</guid>
		<description>Uh-oh!  Just discovered my anonymous dirty comment.  Guess it managed to get posted after all - and now I&#039;ve blown my cover!  However, the other comments which I posted under this entry are accounted for in number but are not yet posted to read.  I feel so confused and vulnerable - think I&#039;ll go find a rock to hide under.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh-oh!  Just discovered my anonymous dirty comment.  Guess it managed to get posted after all &#8211; and now I&#8217;ve blown my cover!  However, the other comments which I posted under this entry are accounted for in number but are not yet posted to read.  I feel so confused and vulnerable &#8211; think I&#8217;ll go find a rock to hide under.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirty Girl</title>
		<link>http://thoughtdistillery.com/2004/07/05/46/comment-page-1#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirty Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtdistillery.com/blog/?p=46#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Okay, just got your handy directions which you so kindly posted.  Sounds like too many techy buttons to push.  Perhaps if there were some gears and levers involved (maybe even some diesel engine sound effects) I might give it a try.  I&#039;m so foolishly stubborn, I&#039;m going back to my rock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, just got your handy directions which you so kindly posted.  Sounds like too many techy buttons to push.  Perhaps if there were some gears and levers involved (maybe even some diesel engine sound effects) I might give it a try.  I&#8217;m so foolishly stubborn, I&#8217;m going back to my rock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://thoughtdistillery.com/2004/07/05/46/comment-page-1#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtdistillery.com/blog/?p=46#comment-101</guid>
		<description>I agree - a diesel engine would be good. Especially since I could fuel it up at the local &lt;a href=&quot;http://greaseworks.org/&quot;&gt;Biodiesel Coop.&lt;/a&gt; Then we&#039;d have not only nice rumbly sounds to grasp, but also some earth-friendly french fry smelling exhaust to dance through.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8211; a diesel engine would be good. Especially since I could fuel it up at the local <a href="http://greaseworks.org/">Biodiesel Coop.</a> Then we&#8217;d have not only nice rumbly sounds to grasp, but also some earth-friendly french fry smelling exhaust to dance through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

